Thursday 05 May 2016

 

The value of university rankings in helping nations develop their higher education systems was debated in a passionate session today at Going Global, the British Council’s annual conference for leaders of international education, held in Africa for the first time.

Dr Blade Nzimande, MP, Minister for Higher Education and Training, South Africa, told a packed room that rankings were a reality, and impossible to ignore. However, he expressed concerns that there was a danger to view and use rankings in isolation of the context in which individual universities operate. “We must aim to achieve excellence in South African universities. But we must achieve excellence in a way that is good for the developmental priorities of our country. We achieve excellence by seeking solutions to the challenges that face a developing country”

Phil Baty, Editor of the Times Higher Education World University Rankings, said that rankings provided the tools to help universities act and compete on the world stage, and this in turn enabled the long-term development of a continental-wide infrastructure for learning and research. “Africa has many pressing priorities that current global, research-focused university rankings do not address. But acting on these challenges while also nurturing a necessarily select group of world-class, globally focused universities need not be mutually exclusive.”

“I’m a great believer in the importance of diversity in higher education systems: put simply, there is no one single correct model of excellence. And the existing world university rankings are, I would argue, in harmony with the African Union’s Agenda 2063 programme” Baty said.

Dr Gerald Ouma, Director, Centre for Higher Education Transformation (CHET), University of Pretoria, South Africa, agreed that rankings try to develop excellence. He said, “But the big question is what kind of excellence? Do we have a one size fits all definition of excellence? Excellence cannot be understood in isolation, it has to be understood in the context of the countries where the university operates.”

Prof. Ellen Hazelkorn, Policy Advisor, Higher Education Authority and Director, Higher Education Policy Research Unit, Ireland, told delegates that there was no doubt that in a globalised world, rankings mattered. But Prof Hazelkorn stressed to the audience, “The focus needs to be on the overall system – what are you trying to achieve? Why would you use indicators set by someone else to determine your national priorities? You must focus on what is meaningful, rather than just focus on counting what is accessible.”

“The big concern with rankings is when they become a policy driver, from what is essentially a report card on disparities of wealth…As a benchmarking tool, rankings are fine. As a policy driver, [rankings are] a bad idea. We should be looking at building world class systems of higher education, not world class universities.” Prof Hazelkorn added.

 

About the British Council

The British Council is the UK’s international organisation for cultural relations and educational opportunities. We create international opportunities for the people of the UK and other countries and build trust between them worldwide.

We work in more than 100 countries and our 8,000 staff – including 2,000 teachers – work with thousands of professionals and policy makers and millions of young people every year by teaching English, sharing the arts and delivering education and society programmes.

We are a UK charity governed by Royal Charter. A core publicly-funded grant provides 20 per cent of our turnover which last year was £973 million. The rest of our revenues are earned from services which customers around the world pay for, such as English classes and taking UK examinations, and also through education and development contracts and from partnerships with public and private organisations. All our work is in pursuit of our charitable purpose and supports prosperity and security for the UK and globally.

For more information, please visit www.britishcouncil.org.